Blog 1- The Importance of Stock Market Efficiency
Stock markets
are growing. New markets are appearing in less developed countries to rival
traditional stock markets, meaning stock markets are expanding all over the
world. There has also been advances specifically in UK financial markets,
caused by a number of things: increases in rapid changes in ICT; emergent of
new types of trading, impacting on the modern market place; deregulation of
financial markets; institutionalisation. One thing that is important for any
stock market in any country is that it is efficient; no investors will be
interested in getting involved in any stock market that is not efficient and
fair.
What is meant by stock market
efficiency? Put simply, in an efficient market, no trader is better off than
any other. Neither technical nor fundamental analysis can yield risk-adjusted
excess returns, only insider information can result in outsized risk-adjusted
returns. No trader has the opportunity to gain a return on a share that is any
bigger than a fair return for the risk associated with the share- apart from by
chance. In an efficient market, the only way an investor can obtain better
results is from buying riskier investments.
In an ideal world, all stock markets
would be efficient and no investors would be able to predict market movements,
but is this the case? Not entirely; a lot of studies suggest that prices do not
move randomly like they should, or at least not fully.
Recently, the US stock market took a
bad hit sending equities tumbling causing investors to stop putting their money
into stocks. After a few weeks however, investors have returned cautiously to
the stock market. Data shows that investors are beginning to allocate their
money to buying stocks again even after a bad fall in the market. For me,
investors collectively pulling out of the market and now collectively
reinvesting their money, shows signs of an efficient market. The fact that all
investors have done this at the same time due to the fall in the market shows
that no investors have got any more information- or insider knowledge- than one
another.
One theory about stock market is
Kendall’s theory of ‘Random Walks’, saying that there should be no systematic
link between one share price movement to the next; share prices at any time
should reflect all known information. In my opinion I think this would be
difficult to achieve in a market. For there to be NO links at all between share
price movements investors would need to be investing in shares completely
random and unrelated to each other. Otherwise, I think that share price
movements from similar companies will inevitably influence each other.
This theory was then built upon by
Fama, introducing three types of stock market efficiency: weak form efficiency,
semi-strong efficiency and strong form efficiency. These are essentially what
they say on the tin. A weak form efficiency means a market’s current share
prices reflect all past movements- an efficient market does the opposite to
this. A semi-strong efficiency means a market that reflects all historic and
publicly available information and can react quickly to new information.
Whereas a strong form efficiency means the share prices reflect ALL information
and no one can make abnormal returns in the market.
Looking at different theories and various news articles
regarding stock markets and their efficiency, I think the importance of an
efficient market is clear. However, actually being able to ensure that a stock
market is fully efficient proves difficult. For me, it is interesting that each
stock market in each country has a different set of companies with different
prices of shares and different investors, meaning the efficiency from one
country to the next can vary significantly. All stock markets may be monitored differently
and some movements may need monitoring more than others; certainly emerging and
less developed markets need more research. Whereas, a large developed stock
market like the US already has a lot of research concentrated on it.

This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteOverall, this blog is pretty good. It conveys a lot of relevant information surrounding efficient market hypothesis and the various theories which follow. The synthesis is strong with the content in lectures, reads very well and reflection is clear in areas. However, there are few questions I could ask:
ReplyDelete1) ) At the beginning you talk about how one thing that is important for a stock market in any country is that it is efficient and fair, do you really think that the market behaves in the ways that the theory talks about? Or do you think that there are other factors involved that contradict what EMH talks about?
2) Are there any examples in the news recently that reflects efficient market hypothesis and what are your views on how the market reacted in that example?
Yes I do think it is important for all stock markets to be fair, as people would not want to be involved in a stock market that is not fair and could just take their investment to other countries. For example, this happened in Nigeria- people took their money from the Nigerian stock exchange and invested in NYSE or LSE instead. However, do I think the market behaves in this way? Well, I know that stock exchanges and regulators create rules to create a perception of a fair market, however, this does not necessarily mean that the market is actually fair. I do think there is some truth to Kendall's Random Walk theory, as Fama supported this.
DeleteAlthough not that recent, one example from the news about this subject is that of the BP oil spill in 2010. I think the market showed elements of a strong-form efficient market as a lot of investors reacted at the same time to the scandal and sold their shares, if the market was not efficient, investors would have reacted more slowly to this.